W3JL

Antenna Project

NVIS: Regional HF Without the Skip Zone

A compact 40/80 m antenna built to put signals straight up and back down, covering the region a VHF repeater can't reach and normal HF skip jumps over.

What NVIS is

Near Vertical Incidence Skywave sends HF energy almost straight up. When the frequency is below the ionosphere's critical frequency (foF2), the signal reflects back down over a wide circle around the station, roughly 0 to 300+ miles, with no skip zone in the middle.

Ground wave

Short range, drops off fast over terrain. Good across town, poor beyond that.

Normal skip

Low takeoff angles land hundreds of miles away and leave a dead zone close in.

NVIS

High takeoff angles fill in that close-in zone with steady, even coverage.

F2 layer low angle: long skip NVIS fills in close skip zone skip lands
High-angle NVIS energy returns close to home; low-angle energy skips past the region.

Picking the band: foF2

NVIS only works below foF2, the highest frequency the F2 layer will reflect straight back down. It rises during the day and with the solar cycle, and falls at night.

ConditionsTypical band
Daytime, good conditions40 m (7 MHz)
Evening / transition60 m (5 MHz)
Night, low solar activity80 m (3.5–4 MHz)

Check a current ionosonde or foF2 map before picking a band. Operating a little below foF2 gives the most reliable path.

The antenna: a loaded inverted V

The goal was 40 and 80 m NVIS from a single, quick-to-deploy support.

Model vs. measurement

The design was modeled in EZNEC first, then checked with an antenna analyzer after it was built.

0.72 dB
Loading coil loss on 80 m
15 ft
Mast height
2 bands
40 m and 80 m, one feed

The coil costs well under 1 dB, a small price for shortening the 80 m legs enough to fit the same mast. The model's predicted coverage rings show the even, close-in footprint NVIS is known for.

On the air: A/B against a vertical

To see the difference in practice, I ran FT8 on 40 m and compared reports from the inverted V against a 6-BTV vertical. The vertical's low-angle pattern favors distant stations; the inverted V favors the regional ring the vertical tends to miss.

Takeaway: for regional HF, a low horizontal antenna beats a vertical close in. For DX, the vertical wins. Having both covers the whole range.

Try it yourself